先前之研究結果顯著揭示,個體所獲取的支持量對其認知共情能力具有影響作用,然而,截至目 前,此關係背後的運作機制尚屬未知。為深入探討其內在的影響機制與作用路徑,本研究聚焦於 探析 2023 名通過自我報告問卷的大學生群體,在家庭支持、核心自我評價、認知共情能力,以及 問題性手機使用問題程度之間的調節與中介效應。研究結果明確指出,家庭支持與認知共情之間 存在正向關聯。進一步的中介分析則彰顯,核心自我評價在這一關係中扮演了關鍵的中介角色, 其影響力尤為顯著。此外,核心自我評價對認知共情的效應還受到問題性手機使用的調節,這一 發現尤為引人矚目。值得注意的是,此調節機制並非單純線性,而是依據核心自我評價的不同水 準而有所變化。具體而言,當大學生的核心自我評價處於較高水準時,問題性手機使用的增加反 而導致認知共情能力的減弱;反之,若核心自我評價偏低,則問題性手機使用的提升或許能在某 種程度上提升認知共情。此項研究不僅增進了我們對家庭支持與問題性手機使用如何及何時影響 大學生認知共情能力的理解,亦為未來心理學領域的相關研究提供了寶貴的理論與實證基礎。
In recent years, numerous international studies (Antunes et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2015; Twenge et al., 2021) have focused on adolescent loneliness, and related studies have also been conducted in Taiwan (Lin & Hsing, 2022). These studies have all found that adolescent loneliness is an issue that warrants serious attention. According to the literature, the impact of loneliness on adolescents is multifaceted. On the emotional level, it has been associated with depressive symptoms (Allen et al., 2014; Caputi et al., 2017), suicidal behaviors (He & Xiang, 2022), and family and school interpersonal relationships (Allen et al., 2014; Antunes et al., 2022; Engels et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2015; Marini et al., 2006; Mattanah et al., 2004; Wei et al., 2005). On the behavioral level, loneliness has been linked to internet addiction or internet gaming disorder (Ho & Kao, 2021; Konan et al., 2018; Primack et al., 2017; Sarıalioğlu et al., 2022; Song et al., 2014; Twenge & Spitzberg, 2020; Twenge et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2022), weight control (Qualter et al., 2018), and shy behaviors (Bowker et al., 2019). Adolescent loneliness has thus emerged as a pressing global issue that requires collective attention. The present study aims to focus on adolescent loneliness in Taiwan and explore possible coping strategies. In response to adolescent loneliness, this study attempts to adopt the concept of group therapy as an intervention approach. Zhang et al. (2023) and Mahon (2024) indicated that social support and emotional companionship within group therapy are effective methods for addressing loneliness. This study posits that if loneliness reflects a desire for relationships but is accompanied by either the loss of most relationships or the inability to attain satisfaction within them, then “group cohesion” may serve as its opposite. Group cohesion be significantly associated with the effectiveness of group therapy (Burlingame et al., 2011; Burlingame et al., 2018; Christensen et al., 2021; Gully et al., 2012; Naeli et al., 2022; Norcross & Wampold, 2011). Furthermore, empirical evidence suggests that group cohesion plays a role in reducing interpersonal difficulties. For example, Fjermestad et al. (2025) investigated adolescents with anxiety disorders, noting that such disorders may lead to social anxiety or interpersonal withdrawal. Their study emphasized the effectiveness of cultivating peer relationships and social skills in group therapy. Results showed that. They shifted from initially placing more trust in the group leader as the group progressed to increasingly valuing emotional support and interactions among group members. It demonstrated that adolescents’ sense of belonging and connectedness to other members and the group increased. Moreover, the study found that group cohesion not only serves as an effective factor in reducing adolescent anxiety and promoting mental health but also becomes increasingly important over time. Similarly, A significant association was found between group cohesion and social anxiety symptoms at the conclusion of group therapy, suggesting that higher group cohesion may be linked to lower levels of social anxiety symptoms (McEvoy et al., 2024). Their findings highlighted group cohesion as one of the core factors in treating social anxiety disorder. Overall, of loneliness, which primarily involves the quantity of interpersonal interactions (loss of most relationships) and quality (inability to achieve satisfaction within relationships). For example, O’Shea et al. (2015) drawing from an interpersonal
青少年、孤寂感、團體凝聚力、團體諮商
adolescent, loneliness, group cohesion, group counseling