回顧臺灣課程領域發展史的相關研究，雖然隨著課程研究的蓬勃發 展，在研究數量方面已有顯著的成長，但在理論觀點與分析取徑方面，和西 方相較，仍是明顯不足。為了讓臺灣課程領域歷史研究所採取的理論觀點與 分析取徑更加多元，本研究認為有必要對目前西方相關的課程領域歷史研究 文獻進行後設分析，反思其歷史特質，以提供作為進行臺灣課程領域歷史研 究的參考。為達上述研究目的，在研究立場方面，本研究將歷史研究視為在 提供不斷增加之觀點的理解，在分析策略方面，則是透過蒐集與分析西方和 臺灣重要的課程領域歷史研究論文，對相關的理論觀點與分析取徑進行綜合 性的討論。最後，本研究並根據前述分析結果，提出未來進行臺灣課程領域 歷史研究的建議。

Review related historical research of Taiwan’s curriculum field shows that, although the amount of the research have increased dramatically, thanks to the boom in curriculum research, perspectives and analysis approaches are not as prosperous as those in the West. To understand the history of Taiwan curriculum field development entirely, it is necessary to borrow analysis perspectives and approaches from the West. Based on the above purposes, the study adopts the stance that history research should contain multi- dimensional views. Further, the study conducts meta-analysis on the historical research of the curriculum field in the West and in Taiwan. Finally, according to the results of the study, some suggestions are provided about historical research of curriculum field in Taiwan.

課程史;課程領域;分析取徑;歷史研究

curriculum history, curriculum field, analysis approach, historical study