本研究旨在探討臺北市特殊教育相關專業團隊人員提供服務之現況與困擾，並分析不同背景之特殊教育相關專業團隊人員在現況及困擾之差異。採問卷調查法，以研究者自編之「臺北市特殊教育相關專業團隊治療師服務現況調查問卷」為工具，研究對象為102學年度後曾提供臺北市特殊教育相關專業團隊服務之相關專業團隊人員。共發出問卷145份，回收116份，回收率達80%。以次數分配、百分比、平均數、標準差、效果量等進行資料處理，得知臺北市特殊教育相關專業團隊人員在整體「專業團隊服務現況」與臺北市訂定之相關規範屬於高符合；在整體「專業團隊服務困擾」上屬於低困擾。比較不同背景治療師後發現，資深治療師在「專團服務與規範」向度上較資淺治療師符合，而資深治療師在整體「專業團隊服務困擾」上較資淺治療師感到更為困擾。物理治療師在整體「相關專業團隊服務現況」較語言治療師符合；「專團服務與規範」向度上，物理治療師較職能治療師感到困擾；在「專團親師協助情形」向度上，語言治療師較物理、職能治療師感到更為困擾；語言治療師在整體「專業團隊服務困擾」上較物理、職能治療師感到更為困擾。

Since 2013, the Taipei City Government has revised regulations on the related services for the special education collaborative team in schools. The current status and dilemmas of the related services professionals in the special education collaborative team were investigated, as well as to analyze the differences in current status and dilemmas faced by these therapists in order to clarify the implementation status and difficulties encountered by the field workers after the regulations. In this study, the questionnaire survey was applied with the author’s self-made “Questionnaire on the Current Status of the Therapists in the Special Education Collaborative team in Taipei City”. Participants were recruited among the special education collaborative team since 2013. In total, 145 questionnaires were sent and 116 valid questionnaires were returned, yielding a response rate of 80%. The conclusions were summarized: 1) The professionals in the special education collaborative teams in Taipei City showed a high degree of conformity to the regulations issued by the “Current Status of Collaborative Team Services” and a low degree of imposition on the “Dilemmas of Collaborative Team Services”. 2) It was found that compared to junior and senior therapists showed a higher degree of conformity on the “Collaborative Team Services and Regulations” under the “Current Status of Collaborative Team Services” and a higher degree of imposition on the overall “Dilemmas of Collaborative Team Services”. 3) The physical therapists showed a higher degree of conformity on the “Current Status of Collaborative Team Services” than speech therapists and a higher degree of imposition on the “Collaborative Team Services and Regulations” under the “Dilemmas of Collaborative Team Services” than occupational therapists. And speech therapists showed a higher degree of imposition on the “Dilemmas of Collaborative Team Services” than both physical and occupational therapists.

治療師; 相關專業團隊; 特殊教育; 問卷調查法

therapist; related service collaborative team; special education; questionnaire survey