本文是藉明代後期思想界的一個小人物豐坊及他所僞作的石經《大學》來探討它與當時思想界的爭論。由這一部書的出現，以及它能迅速吸引大量一流思想家的注意，可以看出當時思想界對程朱、陸王的聚訟，以及《大學》文本之爭的深刻焦慮。此外，透過這一本僞書及它的支持者們所作的詮釋，也可以勾稽出當時一股修正王學的思想動向。

Feng Fang (ca. 1500-1570) was described by his contemporaries as a "daring fool." He was famous for forging a text Ink Rubbing of the Stone-Inscribed Great Learning (Shih-ching Ta-hsüeh), which was related to a major controversy between Chu Hsi's "New Version" of the Great Learning and Wang Yang-ming's "Ancient Version." Owing to the scarcity of early historical sources of the Great Learning, no scholar had been able to solve this problem convincingly. Feng Fang, an unsuccessful official, announced that he found an ink rubbing of a stone inscribed with the Great Learning. In fact it is a fake, and Feng Fang hoped to impress his contemporaries by solving a long debated case. The text he forged clearly undermined the reliability of both Chu's and Wang's versions. However, the forged text was almost identical to the "Ancient Version," thus less damaging to Wang Yang-ming. This essay also discusses new battles generated by Feng's forged text. Expectations and interpretations were diverse. Scholars interpreted this text all according to their intellectual inclinations.

明代思想；豐坊；僞造文獻

Ming intellectual history; Feng Fang; Forged text