keyboard_backspace
返回卷期清單 (第12卷 第2期 / 2025 / 9)
第12卷 第2期
/
2025 / 9
/
pp. 329 - 348
DOI:
比較傳統式與血流限制阻力健身運動對計畫相關執行功能之影響
Comparing the Effects of Traditional and Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise on Planning-Related Executive Function
27
39
作者
吳亭葶 Ting-Ting Wu
(國立清華大學運動科學系 Department of Kinesiology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan)
洪辰歆 Chen-Sin Hung
(國立臺灣師範大學體育與運動科學系 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan)
王上杰 Shang-Chieh Wang
(國立清華大學運動科學系 Department of Kinesiology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan)
謝漱石 Shu-Shih Hsieh
(金斯頓大學心理學系 Department of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, UK)
陳豐慈 Feng-Tzu Chen *
(國立清華大學運動科學系 Department of Kinesiology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan)
吳亭葶 Ting-Ting Wu
國立清華大學運動科學系 Department of Kinesiology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
洪辰歆 Chen-Sin Hung
國立臺灣師範大學體育與運動科學系 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
王上杰 Shang-Chieh Wang
國立清華大學運動科學系 Department of Kinesiology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
謝漱石 Shu-Shih Hsieh
金斯頓大學心理學系 Department of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, UK
陳豐慈 Feng-Tzu Chen *
國立清華大學運動科學系 Department of Kinesiology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
中文摘要

目的：比較傳統式與血流限制阻力健身運動對計畫相關執行功能之影響。方法：本研究共招募30位健康成年人(平均年齡：21.33 ± 1.04歲)，量測倫敦塔作業(Tower of London task) 作為基準值後，並以平衡次序法進行兩種情境，傳統式中等強度阻力健身運動情境(70% 1-RM) 與血流限制搭配低強度阻力健身運動情境(30% 1-RM; 160 mmHg)，並於情境介入後量測倫敦塔作業以評估計畫相關執行功能之表現。結果：傳統式阻力健身運動與血流限制阻力健身運動情境在倫敦塔作業五項指標上(總移動正確數、總移動次數、總起初時間、總執行時間與總問題解決時間) 皆優於基準值，然傳統式阻力健身運動與血流限制阻力健身運動情境在該些指標上則無顯著差異性。另外，相較於傳統式阻力健身運動，血流限制阻力健身運動情境展現較低心率與較低運動自覺費力程度。結論：經傳統式健身運動或血流限制阻力健身運動介入後，在計畫相關執行功能呈現相似之表現。故對於無法負荷中等強度健身運動之個體，血流限制搭配低強度阻力健身運動，似乎可作為未來傳統式中等強度阻力健身運動之替代方案。

英文摘要

Purpose: Comparing the effects of traditional and blood flow restriction (BFR) resistance exercise on planning-related executive function. Methods: The study recruited 30 healthy adults (mean age: 21.33 ± 1.04 years). The Tower of London task was administered as a baseline measurement. The participants underwent two exercise conditions in a counterbalanced order: a traditional moderate-intensity resistance exercise condition (70% 1-RM) and a BFR combined with low-intensity resistance exercise condition (30% 1-RM; 160 mmHg). After each intervention, participants performed the Tower of London task to assess their planning-related executive function. Results: The findings revealed that both the traditional resistance exercise and BFR resistance exercise conditions showed outperformed across the five indicators of the Tower of London task (total correct scores, total move score, total initiation time, total execution time, and total problem-solving time) compared to baseline. However, there were no significant differences between the two conditions in these indicators. In addition, compared to traditional resistance exercise, blood flow restriction resistance exercise scenarios exhibited lower heart rate and RPE. Conclusion: The findings suggest that both traditional resistance exercise and BFR resistance exercise interventions demonstrated similar performance on planning-related executive function. Therefore, for individuals who cannot perform moderate intensity exercise, BFR combined with low-intensity resistance exercise may serve as an alternative to traditional moderate-intensity resistance exercise.

中文關鍵字

身體活動; 加壓訓練; 認知功能; 急性健身運動; 倫敦塔作業

英文關鍵字

physical activity; occlusion training; cognition, acute exercise; Tower of London task