目的：探討2023年亞洲女子排球錦標賽四強隊伍(泰國、中國、日本、越南) 及中華隊後排攻擊的使用次數、得分效果及使用占比之差異。方法：使用攝影機錄製賽事影像，並透過Nacsport軟體記錄後排攻擊路線(一、六與五號位)、攻擊次數、得分次數。統計分析採用無母數Mann-Whitney U檢驗比較勝敗局後排攻擊的差異，以及Kruskal-Wallis H檢驗不同國家後排攻擊的差異。結果：在勝敗局中，僅有日本隊六號位後排攻擊的得分率具有顯著差異(p < .05, Z = -2.27)，而其他國家在不同後排攻擊的得分率及使用占比皆無顯著差異。不同國家在勝利局中後排攻擊的使用占比存在顯著差異(p < .05)。中華隊在一號位的使用占比顯著高於日本；在六號位，日本的使用占比顯著高於泰國；而在五號位，日本和中國的使用占比則顯著低於中華隊，但得分次數與效率並未顯著差異。在敗局中，僅一號位的使用占比有顯著差異(p < .05)，泰國的使用比例高於越南。結論：在亞錦賽四強隊伍及中華隊的後排攻擊策略中，雖然各隊伍均將後排攻擊納入進攻戰術，但除了日本隊以外，其他隊伍的後排攻擊對比賽結果的影響並不顯著。因此，提升選手基礎能力及整體戰術配合連結性來獲取更高的得分效率，這點對於教練在未來後排攻擊與其他戰術發展提供重要依據。

Purpose: To investigate disparities in the use and effectiveness of back-row attacks among the top four teams (Thailand, China, Japan, Vietnam) and the Chinese Taipei team in the 2023 Asian Women's Volleyball Championship. Methods: Video recordings of matches were analyzed using Nacsport software to document the back-row attack routes (Zones 1, 6, 5), attack numbers, and points scored. Statistical analyses were conducted using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test to compare differences in back-row attacks between winning and losing sets and the Kruskal-Wallis H test to assess differences in back-row attacks across different countries. Results: When comparing winning and losing sets, only Japan’s back-row attacks in Zone 6 exhibited a significant difference in scoring rate (p < .05, Z = -2.27), while other countries showed no significant variations in scoring rates or utilization rates for back-row attacks. Noteworthy differences (p < .05) in the utilization rates of back-row attacks were observed among countries in winning sets. Chinese Taipei had a higher utilization rate in Zone 1 compared to Japan; Japan had a significantly higher utilization rate in Zone 6 compared to Thailand; and in Zone 5, Japan and China had notably lower utilization rates compared to Chinese Taipei, although there were no significant differences in the number of points scored or scoring efficiency. In the losing sets, significant differences (p < .05) in utilization rates were only observed in Zone 1, where Thailand had a higher utilization rate compared to Vietnam. Conclusion: The analysis of back-row attack strategies among the top four teams in the Asian Championship, including Chinese Taipei, reveals that all teams have integrated back-row attacks into their offensive strategies. However, except for Japan, the impact of back-row attacks on match outcomes is not significant for the other teams. Therefore, enhancing players' fundamental skills and improving overall tactical coordination to enhance scoring efficiency will be crucial for coaches in the future development of back-row attacks and other strategies.

排球; 戰術分析; 排球錦標賽

volleyball; tactical analysis; volleyball tournament