近年來，青少年親職化持續受到華人研究者的關注，然而在測量工具上更多倚賴修訂後的國外量 表，依據在地親職化生活經驗編製的量表較少。因此，本研究擬以混合方式編製具有信、效度， 與文化適應性的「青少年親職化量表」。首先，在整理過往親職化量表的基礎上，以 106 份開放 式問卷蒐集、歸納出關鍵字詞，經過專家評估之後完成預試量表的編擬。其次，突破傳統因素分 析方法之限制，改採探索性結構方程模式對 663 位大陸青少年的正式施測數據進行統計分析。研 究發現，「青少年親職化量表」分為兩個分量表，其中「親職化角色行為」分量表除包括西方量 表中原有的「非特定家庭責任」、「父母的父母」、「父母的情緒配偶」、「手足的父母」等向 度之外，還有深具孝道文化特色之「主動娛親」、「使親無憂」等新向度；「親職化情緒感受」 分量表則涵蓋了過往西方量表中的「不公平感」，以及華人研究者所發現之「罪疚感」向度。統 計分析結果顯示，兩個分量表及其各向度的信、效度均達到可接受水準。本研究在理論層面拓展 了親職化角色行為與情緒感受的內涵，也嘗試探索了華人青少年親職化與心理健康的關係。最後， 針對華人青少年親職化的未來研究方向，提出討論與建議。

In recent years, Parentification has continued to attract the attention of researchers within the Chinese academic community. However, the measurement tools predominantly rely on revised foreign scales, with fewer scales developed based on local lived experiences of parentification. Therefore, this study aims to build upon existing parentification theories and measurement tools and collecting items generated freely by participants that reflect their local lived experiences of parentification. By integrating these two sources, this study seeks to explore the specific manifestations and structural dimensions of parentification behaviors and feelings within the context of Chinese filial piety culture. Ultimately, the goal is to develop a parentification measurement tool suitable for mainland Chinese adolescents, thereby obtaining more localized evidence regarding the impact of parentification on adolescent mental health. This will contribute to advancing empirical research on parentification in Chinese contexts. First, during the initial stage of scale item development, this study reviewed international scales used to assess adolescent parentification in previous research. These include the Parentification Scale (PS) (Mika et al., 1987), the Parentification Questionnaire—Youth Version (PQ-Y) (Godsall & Jurkovic, 1995), the Filial Responsibility Scale (FRS, later revised into Chinese) (Jurkovic & Thirkield, 1999; Shih, 2007), the Parentification Inventory (PI) (Hooper et al., 2011), and the Parentification Questionnaire for Youth (KPdM; Borchet et al., 2020). Among the scales developed within Chinese research are the Parentification Scale (Hou, 2008), the Parentification Scale for High School and Vocational Students (Chien, 2010), the Parentification Questionnaire for Junior High School Students (Xu, 2021), and the Multidimensional Assessment of Caring Activities Checklist (MACA-YC18) (Joseph et al., 2009). After consolidating overlapping items and removing those with redundant content, tangential descriptions, or items deemed inappropriate for the mainland Chinese context, 50 items remained. Second, 106 students from junior high, high school, and vocational schools in Guangdong, Sichuan, Hunan, and Inner Mongolia—representing the eastern, western, southern, and northern regions of mainland China, respectively—were selected to complete an “Open-Ended Questionnaire on Family Life Experiences.” After preliminary organization of the data collected from the open-ended questionnaires, responses that were off-topic, semantically unclear, or ambiguous were removed, resulting in 669 descriptions of parentification behaviors and feelings. After merging duplicates, 164 unique descriptions remained. These were integrated with items from existing parentification scales to form an initial conceptual structure of parentification. Based on this, a preliminary version of the scale was developed for expert content validity assessment, consisting of 61 items across 9 dimensions. Following expert feedback, the scale was refined to 57 items, with 39 items in the “Parentification Behaviors”

親職化、量表編製、青少年、大陸地區

parentification, scale development, adolescents, Chinese Mainland