本文主要分為二大部分。第一部分主要是從胡適的《中國哲學史大綱》(上冊)出現的「時機」，它所提供的「形式」，以及它所宣示的「科學方法」這三個方面，剖析和探究該書何以能在中國學術由傳統向現代轉型的最關鍵時刻，為中國學術轉型的成功起了最關鍵的作用。第二部分則主要從「時代精神」之逆或順、「瞭解之同情」之無或有、「學術取向」之隔或不隔，以及「典範轉移」之水到渠成這四個方面，把胡適和馮友蘭、胡書與馮書一一作出比較，以探究和剖析馮書之所以能全面超越並取代胡書的最重要因緣。

This essay consists of two parts. By exploring several important issues in Hu Shi’s Zhongguo zhexueshi dagang (An Outline History of Chinese Philosophy 《中國哲學史大綱》), such as the timing of its appearance, its academic format, and its putatively scientific methods, the first part of the essay attempts to explain how and why it could establish itself as a new paradigm for the humanities at a crucial moment of the transformation of Chinese academic culture. The second part, however, comes to the conclusion that Hu Shi’s work was surpassed by Feng Yulan, his former student at Peking University, by comparing four important aspects of Feng Yulan’s Zhongguo zhexueshi (A History of Chinese Philosophy《中國哲學史》) with Hu Shi’s work.

胡適；馮友蘭；中國哲學史

Hu Shi; Feng Yulan; history of Chinese Philosophy