本文的目的是重新探索北宋末年發生的靖康之難。一直以來，很多學者所理解的靖康之難，仍停留在：金人南侵──汴京淪陷──金人廢立異姓的簡單模式上。但是，這種理解並未能清晰地展現出整個事件的圖像。因為金人並非一開始便決定廢掉欽宗，改立張邦昌為皇帝；所以城陷期間，宋金雙方皆嘗試以「帝姬和親」的模式解決危機。然而，因徽宗受北宋以來恥於和親的外交思維所影響，遂對和親之議持否定態度。但更具決定性意義的是金人的取向：鷹派的宗翰從最初接受和親之議，到最後堅決反對的態度；鴿派的宗望則自始便亟欲以和親解決危機，不想宗翰獨佔大功。他們的分歧正代表著兩人之間的爭功與爭權；也說明他們鬥爭的陣地已從金國的朝廷，伸延到北宋的首都汴京。

This paper re-examines the 1126 Jingkang Crisis (靖康之難) that occurred at the end of the Northern Song dynasty. Until now, scholars have generally understood this crisis in terms of the Jurchen invasion, the fall of Bianjing (汴京), and the collapse of the Song. An integrated picture thus has yet to be drawn. This paper shows that the fall of Bianjing to the Jurchens did not determine the end of the Song Dynasty. On the contrary, the Jurchens and the Song attempted to settle the matter by a peaceful proposal of “marriage alliance” ( 帝姬和親). In the end, this proposal did not materialize, partly because Huizong strongly objected to it. But the decisive factor was the struggle between the Jurchen leaders Zonghan (宗翰) and Zongwang (宗望). The former changed his attitude to oppose the proposal while the latter completely supported it. The Song came to an end when their internal struggle became evident in the Song territories.

靖康之難；帝姬和親；徽宗；欽宗；宗翰；宗望

the 1126 Jingkang Crisis; the “Marriage Alliance” policy; Emperor Huizong; Emperor Qinzong; Zonghan; Zongwang