2024年5月28日，立法院三讀通過立法院職權行使法增訂並修正部分條文，其中有不少引發朝野爭議的條文。6月6日，在總統的核可下，行政院將爭議條文，移請立法院覆議。然而，反對黨挾人數優勢以62比51否決覆議案。法案於6月26日生效後，執政黨隨即就爭議條文，由總統、行政院、立法委員柯建銘等51人，以及監察院，向憲法法庭聲請判決。憲法法庭於2024年10月25日做出113年憲判字第9號判決。
本次圓桌論壇乃邀請五位政治學界的憲政學者就幾個爭議的主題加以討論。這些包括總統赴立法院國情報告制度爭議、質詢的憲政意義以及反質詢的問題、立法院人事同意權、調查權與聽證權的行使、藐視國會罪的範圍與處罰。希望藉此拋磚引玉，讓大家關注這類的問題。

On May 28, 2024, the Legislative Yuan passed the third reading of Law Governing the Legislative Yuan`s Power, which added and amended some articles, many of which have caused controversy between the government and the opposition. On June 6, with the approval of the President, the Executive Yuan referred the disputed provisions to the Legislative Yuan for reconsideration. However, opposition parties took advantage of their numerical advantage to veto the motion by 62 to 51.
After the bill was promulgated and came into effect on June 24, the ruling party, including the president, the Executive Yuan, 51 legislators including Ker Chien-Ming, and the Control Yuan, immediately requested a ruling from the Constitutional Court on the controversial provisions. The Constitutional Court made Judgment No. 9 of 113 years on October 25, 2024.
This roundtable forum was held by five constitutional scholars from the political science community to discuss several controversial topics. These include the controversy over the system of the president reporting on the state of the nation to the Legislative Yuan, the constitutional significance of questioning and the issue of counter-questioning, the scope and punishment of contempt of Congress, and the exercise of the right to consent to personnel appointments, the right to investigate, and the right to hold hearings. We hope this discussion will inspire interest in these issues.

覆議、立法院職權行使法、總統國情報告、質詢及反質詢、調查權、藐視國會、人事同意權

veto, Law Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power, President's State of the Union address, question and counter-question, power of investigation, contempt of congress, power of consent