生成式AI帶來學術倫理的灰色地帶，能協助學生改寫文章以避開Turnitin原創性比對，為高等教育環境帶來挑戰。本研究分析臺灣16所頂尖大學的AI指引政策，發現多數政策主要針對教師端，缺乏針對學生的具體使用指導，且僅有2所大學提及圖書館的角色。政大圖書館自2023年9月起舉辦AI利用講習，並於2024年根據政策分析結果重新設計講習課程和有獎徵答活動，強調AI素養（認識AI、使用AI、評估AI、創造AI）並介紹符合學術倫理的使用方式。本研究分享政大圖書館的經驗與挑戰，探索學術圖書館在引導學生負責任使用AI的新角色。

Generative AI introduces gray areas in academic ethics by enabling students to rewrite their work in ways that circumvent Turnitin’s originality checks, thereby posing significant challenges for higher education. This study analyzed the AI guidelines of 16 top universities in Taiwan, revealing that most of these policies primarily address faculty, lack explicit guidance for student use, and only mention the library’s role in two instances. In response, beginning in September 2023, the National Chengchi University (NCCU) Library launched workshops on AI utilization. Building on the findings of the policy analysis, the library plans to redesign these workshops and an accompanying quiz-based engagement activity in 2024. The revised program will emphasize AI literacy—encompassing understanding AI, using AI, evaluating AI, and creating AI—and introduce ethically responsible approaches to AI use in academic work. This paper discusses the NCCU Library’s experiences and challenges, highlighting the emerging role of academic libraries in guiding students toward responsible AI use.

學術倫理; AI素養; AI政策; 資訊素養; 學術圖書館

Academic ethics; AI literacy; AI policy; Information science; Academic library