keyboard_backspace
返回卷期清單 (36(2) / 2007 / 6)
36(2)
/
2007 / 6
/
pp. 19 - 49
由弱裔出發，進行跨國思考
Introduction: Thinking through the Minor, Transnationally
76
16
作者
李歐旎 Françoise Lionnet
(美國加州大學洛杉磯分校法語及法語語系研究系及比較文學系教授 Professor, French and Francophone Studies and Comparative Literature, University of California, Los Angeles)
史書美 Shu-Mei Shih
(美國加州大學洛杉磯分校亞洲語言文化系/亞美研究系及比較文學系三系合聘專任教授 Professor of Comparative Literature, Asian Languages and Cultures, and Asian American Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles)
沈尚玉 Shang-Yu Sheng *
(國立臺灣大學外國語文學系碩士班研究生 M.A. Student, Department and Graduate Institute of Foreign Languages and Literatures, National Taiwan Univeristy)
蘇榕 Jung Su
(國立臺灣師範大學英語學系助理教授 Assistant Professor, Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University)
李歐旎 Françoise Lionnet
美國加州大學洛杉磯分校法語及法語語系研究系及比較文學系教授 Professor, French and Francophone Studies and Comparative Literature, University of California, Los Angeles
史書美 Shu-Mei Shih
美國加州大學洛杉磯分校亞洲語言文化系/亞美研究系及比較文學系三系合聘專任教授 Professor of Comparative Literature, Asian Languages and Cultures, and Asian American Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles
沈尚玉 Shang-Yu Sheng *
國立臺灣大學外國語文學系碩士班研究生 M.A. Student, Department and Graduate Institute of Foreign Languages and Literatures, National Taiwan Univeristy
蘇榕 Jung Su
國立臺灣師範大學英語學系助理教授 Assistant Professor, Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University
中文摘要

本文為2005年出版的《弱勢族群的跨國主義》的引言，提出所謂「弱勢文化的跨國研究」的概念，主張弱勢文化不應只相對於強勢／主流文化，而應和其它地方的弱勢文化串聯起來，將之納入比較及跨國的範疇。弱勢到弱勢的橫向的關係是轉化性文化實踐的所在，演繹新的文化形式，並將之理論化及歷史化。經由對族裔研究、少數民族論述、區域研究、後殖民研究，以及以殖民語言為中心所組織的各弱勢跨國研究（如法語語系研究、西班牙語語系研究、葡萄牙語語系研究、華語語系研究等）的原則性的批評，本文企圖彰顯當今跨國化境況中的弱勢發聲的複雜性及針對它的方法論的複雜性。

英文摘要

Serving as the “Introduction” to the volume Minor Transnationalism published in 2005, this essay argues for what might be called “minor transnational studies” in which minority cultures from different geopolitical locations are posited in comparative and transnational frameworks vis-à-vis each other rather than always in relation to majority cultures. The minor-to-minor horizontal relationality is seen as a productive locus of transformative cultural practices that theorizes, historicizes, and performs new forms of culture. Situated among ethnic studies, minority discourse, area studies, postcolonial studies, and those minor transnational studies organized around a particular colonial language (such as Francophone, Hispanophone, Lusophone, and Sinophone studies), this essay makes a principled critique of each of these disciplinary models to better account for the complexity of minority articulation in the contemporary age of transnationalization.

中文關鍵字

強勢/主流和弱勢/少數跨國主義;轉化性實踐;根莖結構;弱勢文學;解構主義;歐洲中心的普遍主義;認可政治;分流;道地性;跨殖民主義

英文關鍵字

major and minor transnationalism; transformative practice; the rizhome; minor literature; deconstruction; Eurocentric universalism; politics of recognition; branchements; authenticity; transcolonialism