本文探討一個以埔里農村為移居目的地的青年團體在什麼脈絡與條件下，選擇以生活方式為手段來體現農村好生活目的，以及這種預示實踐如何被維持？作者經由生活方式政治視角看到自由空間對於此預示實踐的形成扮演關鍵角色，此自由空間源自農村在發展過程中留下的空隙，青年團體住進這些空間，為農村創造好生活的可能性；而在這個預試實踐的維持過程中，放伴實驗提供了動力。此放伴實驗沒有為青年團體開創有規模的創新創業模式，但是形成以放伴為核心理念的社群。此放伴社群中的互惠交換原則、戲劇空間和逐漸開展的居住空間等要素，是在試誤的過程中創造出來，本文討論的青年團體也因為這些自立條件得以持續留在農村。

From the perspective of lifestyle politics, this article examines the context and conditions in which a youth group, the Guli Cooperative, uses lifestyle as a means to realize the goal of the "Rural Good Life" in rural Puli, and discusses how such lifestyle politics are sustained. The author fi nds that these lifestyle politics are implemented in a prefi gurative way, and "free space" plays a significant role in the formation of this prefigurative practice. This free space is a form of interstice left in rural areas amidst a broader context of economic and urban development, and the youth group chooses to reside in the empty spaces to create possibilities for a good life. In terms of maintaining prefigurative politics, the pàng-phuānn experiment produces a reciprocal principle of exchange without currency, a theatrical space, and expanding living spaces for immigrant youth in a trial-and-error process. This pàng-phuānn community gradually strengthens the youth immigrants' subsistence in rural Puli.

生活方式政治、預示政治、自由空間、移居農村、放伴

lifestyle politics, prefigurative politics, free space, rural relocation, pàng-phuānn