8
/
2008 / 12
/
pp. 91 - 103
羽球現場多點無氧動力測驗與溫蓋特腳踏車測驗的相關
The Correlation between the Multiple Points of Badminton Field Tests and the Wingate Cycling Test for Badminton Players
作者
陳信良 Hsin-Lian Chen
(嘉義大學人體運動表現實驗室 Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University)
吳昶潤 Chang-Jun Wu
(嘉義大學人體運動表現實驗室 Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University)
林明儒 Ming-Ru Lin
(嘉義大學人體運動表現實驗室 Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University)
曾國維 Kuo-Wei Tseng
(台北市立大學運動健康科學系 Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Taipei)
陳忠慶 Trevor C. Chen *
(嘉義大學人體運動表現實驗室 Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University)
陳信良 Hsin-Lian Chen
嘉義大學人體運動表現實驗室 Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University
吳昶潤 Chang-Jun Wu
嘉義大學人體運動表現實驗室 Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University
林明儒 Ming-Ru Lin
嘉義大學人體運動表現實驗室 Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University
曾國維 Kuo-Wei Tseng
台北市立大學運動健康科學系 Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Taipei
陳忠慶 Trevor C. Chen *
嘉義大學人體運動表現實驗室 Department of Physical Education, National Chiayi University
中文摘要
目的:考驗羽球選手進行溫蓋特腳踏車與三種羽球現場無氧動力測驗的運動表現與生理參數之間是否具有正相關之假設。方法:10名大男甲組羽球選手以平衡次序法,各分別進行二次30秒溫蓋特,以及羽球現場30秒3、4和6點無氧動力測驗;每項測驗間隔至少為24小時。所有受試者均配戴心跳紀錄錶測量每項測驗時的心跳(HR),並在每項測驗後,立即進行運動自覺量表(RPE)的測驗;血乳酸(La)安排在每項測驗後第3分鐘進行分析。結果:一、運動表現:溫蓋特與羽球現場3、4和6點測驗之間完成的動力值有正相關(p<.05)。二、生理指標:溫蓋特與3、4和6點測驗之間的La、HR和RPE反應值也都具有正相關(p<.05)。結論:羽球現場3、4和6點與溫蓋特無氧動力測驗之間的運動表現與生理評估指標具有正相關。因此,這三種羽球現場測驗方式可能可以初步提供給羽球教練及運科人員,作為未來評估羽球選手的專項無氧動力之測驗方式。
英文摘要
Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the performance and physiological responses observed following badminton players' performance of the Wingate anaerobic power test would correlate positively with those observed following their performance of three newly designed field tests for badminton players. Methods: Ten male university badminton players were recruited as subjects. Each subject performed one standard anaerobic power test (30-second Wingate power test) and three 30-second badminton-specific field tests (3, 4, and 6-point tests) twice, using a counter-balanced method. Rest intervals of at least 24 hours were given between the tests. All subjects wore heart rate (HR) monitors to measure HR response during each anaerobic power test, and the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was measured immediately after each test. Blood lactate concentration (La) was analyzed at 3 minutes after each test. Results: 1) Performance: The power performance during the Wingate test had a correlation positively (p>.05) with 3, 4 and 6 points tests; 2) Physiological responses: The extent of physiological responses (La, HR, and RPE) during or after the Wingate test had significant (p<.05) positive correlation with 3, 4, and 6-point tests. The results of this study showed that the performance and physiological responses observed during and following the 3, 4, and 6-point badminton field tests correlated positively with those observed during and following the Wingate power test. Conclusions: These three badminton field tests may provide useful information for badminton coaches and sports scientists to use in the evaluation of badminton-specific anaerobic power tests in the future.
中文關鍵字
羽球運動特殊性; 無氧能量系統; 心跳率; 血乳酸
英文關鍵字
Specificity of badminton; Anaerobic system; Heart rate; Blood lactate concentration