keyboard_backspace
返回卷期清單 (26 / 2018 / 6)
26
/
2018 / 6
/
pp. 23 - 31
DOI:
靜態伸展對韻律體操選手下肢勁度和跳躍表現之立即影響
Acute Effect of Static Stretching on Leg Stiffness and Leaping Performance in Rhythmic Gymnasts
15
48
作者
郭育瑄 Yu-Hsuan Kuo
(國立臺灣師範大學體育學系 Department of Physical Education, National Taiwan Normal University)
徐煒杰 Wei-Chieh Hsu
(臺北市立大學競技運動訓練研究所 Graduate Institute of Sports Training, University of Taipei)
鄭景峰 Ching-Feng Cheng *
(國立臺灣師範大學運動競技學系 Department of Athletic Performance, National Taiwan Normal University)
郭育瑄 Yu-Hsuan Kuo
國立臺灣師範大學體育學系 Department of Physical Education, National Taiwan Normal University
徐煒杰 Wei-Chieh Hsu
臺北市立大學競技運動訓練研究所 Graduate Institute of Sports Training, University of Taipei
鄭景峰 Ching-Feng Cheng *
國立臺灣師範大學運動競技學系 Department of Athletic Performance, National Taiwan Normal University
中文摘要

目的：探討靜態伸展（static stretch, SS）對韻律體操選手技術跳躍和垂直跳的影響。方法：11名韻律體操選手，採隨機交叉實驗設計，均須實施SS處理和控制（control, CON）處理，SS包括股二頭肌、股四頭肌、臀大肌和腓腸肌，每動作伸展15秒，共6組。於處理後，立即檢測技術跳躍（跨跳、分腿跳、結環跳）、下蹲跳與連續雙足跳等測驗。結果：SS和CON在三種技術跳躍的騰空時間，均無顯著差異（SS vs. CON，跨跳，658 ± 29 vs. 659 ± 34 ms；分腿跳，588 ± 30vs. 587 ± 30 ms；結環跳，680 ± 34 vs. 675 ± 29 ms，p ＞ .05），下蹲跳和連續雙足跳也無明顯差異。結論：15秒的SS不會降低韻律體操選手隨後技術跳躍和爆發力表現。

英文摘要

Purpose: This study examined the effects of static stretching (SS) on the technical leaps and vertical jump performance in rhythmic gymnasts. Methods: Eleven rhythmic gymnasts were recruited in this random-order and crossover designed study. All participants were requested to perform two different treatments: SS and control (CON). The SS treatment consisted of 6 repetitions of 15-s static stretching exercise for each muscle group (hamstrings, quadriceps, gluteus, and gastrocnemius). After each treatment, participants immediately performed technical leap tests (split leap forward with legs stretched [SLS], side straddle [SSD], split leap forward with ring [SLR]), counter-movement jump (CMJ), and hopping test. Results: No significant differences were found between SS and CON on the flight time in the technical leap tests (SS vs. CON: SLS, 658 ± 29 vs. 659 ± 34 ms; SSD, 588 ± 30 vs. 587 ± 30 ms; SLR, 680 ± 34 vs. 675 ± 29 ms, p ＞ .05). There were no significant differences in CMJ and hopping test performance between treatments (p ＞ .05). Conclusion: The 15-s SS might not impair subsequent technical leaps and explosive performance in rhythmic gymnasts.

中文關鍵字

熱身活動; 活動範圍; 運動表現

英文關鍵字

warm-up; range of motion; exercise performance