目的：比較使用光速摩卡圈(MOKA, MK)與呼拉圈(Hula Hoop,HL)時的動作特性與運動強度差異。方法：18位健康女性（21.9 ± 1.8歲）隨機分別使用MK與HL三分鐘。使用Motion Analysis動作影像分析系統分析各項運動學參數。利用CARDIOsport GT5心率錶紀錄受試者運動時心跳率變化的情形。以相依樣本t檢定比較兩種訓練環在各依變項之間的差異。結果：使用HL時的髖關節活動角度範圍以及保留心跳率皆顯著大於MK (p< .05)，而動作頻率則無顯著差異。結論：相較於MK，使用HL時會有較大的髖關節活動範圍與運動強度，但對於動作頻率則無顯著差異

Purpose:To compare the difference ofmovement characteristicsandexercise intensitybetweenMOKA (MK) andHula Hoop (HL).Methods:Eighteen healthy females randomly usedMOKAandHula Hoop 3 minutes, respectively. Motion Analysis Systemwas used toanalyzeall kinematicparameters.Cardiosport GT5 heart rate monitorwas used to recordheart rate during movements.The paired t-test was used to analyze the difference between MK and HL in dependent variables.Results:HL had significantlygreater than MK in hip range of movement and heart rate reserved(p< .05); Movement frequency was nosignificant difference between MK and HL.Conclusion:UseofHL has greater than MK in hip range of movement andexercise intensity, butmovementfrequency is nosignificant difference.

健身器材; 搖擺; 傷害

Fitness Equipment; Sway; Injury