羽球為一種流行的運動，但對於專業的羽球選手，仍然會有產生傷害的危險，因此許多鞋廠在降低運動傷害及增進運動表現方面進行設計。但是在於檢測方式的篩選上，並未有一參考資訊。雖然過去有許多相關文獻指出材料測試、人體測試及問卷測試的優缺點，但並未提供一有效率的資訊，因此，本實驗目的為探討不同檢測方式的相關性。本實驗方法為將七雙不同廠牌的市售羽球鞋，分別進行材料測試、人體測試以及問卷調查檢測其功能性。材料測試是使用攜帶式避震反彈測試儀以及力板，進行撞擊試驗，而人體測試則是讓12名受測者做跨步動作收集力板資料，問卷調查是請同批受測者填寫滿意度調查表。相關性統計方式採皮爾森相關係數，顯著水準定為α< .05。本實驗結果顯示，在人體測試與材料測試間，負荷率有顯著相關(r = .762)，其餘的皆未達顯著。此實驗結果顯示出在負荷率的參數上，可利用材料測試取代人體測試而快速取得結果，但人體測試能觀察到的參數仍最完整，而問卷測試則僅能提供受試者的喜好特性。

Badminton is a popular exercise, but the impact force of the specific movements often causedrelated injuries for professional badminton players. Many badminton brands would like to improveand develop their badminton shoes in theaspects of cushion and performance enhancement. Butthere is no standard testing method. Although there had many studies indicate the advantages anddefects in material test, human test and questionnaire. However, no comparative information wasoffered. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation among different testmethods. We used 7 commercial badminton shoes in different brands in this study. The cushioningtest instrument and force plate were used in the material impact test. Twelve subjects performed alunge movements on the force plate and the force were recorded, then completing the satisfiedquestionnaire. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used in determine the correlation amongdifferent tests. Level of significance was set at 0.05. The result indicated that only the loading ratehas significant correlation (r = .762) between human test and material test. The results alsoindicated that the material test can get similar result as human test, but with less time. Thequestionnaire offered the preference of subjects only. Human subject test still can obtain the mostcompleted parameters compared with other test methods.

材料測試; 人體測試; 問卷測試; 羽球鞋

Material test; Human test; Questionnaire; Badminton shoes