《詩經》學發展到宋代，出現了理學化的現象，理學家之間又有學派的區別與學習進路的爭執，其立場與觀點的差異也表現在三百篇的詮釋方法與解釋內涵上，這也顯示出經典文本自身具有開放性的結構。輔廣與楊簡分別是南宋理學大師朱熹與陸九淵的高徒，朱、陸有著兩種不同的理學觀點與治學取向，輔廣與楊簡的《詩經》學也呈現了大異其趣的風味。本文以輔、楊二氏的解《詩》方法與態度為中心，比較《詩童子問》與《慈湖詩傳》闡釋詩篇的異同面向，關注其詮釋的過程以及解義的體系，從中可以考見雙方如何建構起詩文的意旨。最後指出，《詩童子問》的價值高低必須由《詩集傳》來決定，《慈湖詩傳》則全新地開開創了《詩經》的詮釋局面，這是研《詩》之士在為兩書尋求《詩經》學史上的定位與意義時，可以斟酌思考之處。

In the Song Dynasty, the Shi Jing Studies appeared the phenomenon of the Neo-Confucianism comment, there are some school distinction and dispute of study step, their standpoint differences show on the methods and contents in explanation.That demonstrates Classics text itself possesses open structure. Fu Guang and Yang Jian are the master of the Southern Song Dynasty Neo-Confucianism Zhu Xi and Lu Jiu Yuan’s outstanding students. Zhu Xi and Lu Jiu Yuan have two different views of Neo-Confucianism and scholarship orientation. Fu Guang and Yang Jian also presents the different Shi Jing Studies characteristics. This paper studies Fu and Yang’s methods and attitude of Shi Jing interpretation, concern about their process and system of annotation, from here, we can find how did they construct the intention of poems. Finally, this dissertation pointed out that the value of Shi Tong Zi Wen must be determined by Shi Ji Zhuan, Ci Hu Shi Zhuan opened a new way to create the situation of the Shi Jing’s interpretation. When the scholars research into the position and significance of the two books, they can deliberate from this aspect .

輔廣;《詩童子問》;楊簡;《慈湖詩傳》;理學

Fu Guang; Shi Tong Zi Wen;Yang Jian; Ci Hu Shi Zhuan; NeoConfucianism