就《詩經》的詮釋表現與影響力而言，《毛詩傳箋》、《毛詩正義》與《詩集傳》堪稱為《詩經》研究的三個里程碑。當《毛詩傳箋》、《毛詩正義》合為一個文本而成為《毛詩注疏》時，其與《詩集傳》就可以分別代表《詩經》漢學與宋學的代表作，而在《詩經》學史上分別具有典範的身價。本文以相對全面的視角，檢視《毛詩注疏》與《詩集傳》的編纂形式、詩篇主題詮解、詩文訓釋之表現。在比較、評判二者優劣之時，並考慮到《毛詩注疏》與《詩集傳》分屬群體與個人著作，以及由此而呈現出的內容詳簡問題。根據本文的考察，《毛詩注疏》與《詩集傳》各具特色、各擅勝場，而說教立場則完全一致，最後更指出，《詩集傳》有能力作為《詩經》宋學的代表作，但並無取代《毛詩注疏》的條件，這是時代的限制。

In regard to the interpretation, performance and influence of the Shi Jing, the Mao Shi Chuan Jian, the Mao Shi Zheng Yi and the Shi Ji Chuan can be rated as the three milestones of the Shi Jing. When the Mao Shi Chuan Jian and the Mao Shi Zheng Yi were combined into a text, becoming the Mao Shi Zhu Shu, the text and the Shi Ji Chuan can be considered as the masterpieces of the Shi Jing Han study and the Shi Jing Song study respectively, also having paradigmatic values of the Shi Jing study of history. This paper uses opposite comprehensive perspectives to examine the compilation forms, poem topics, interpretations and annotation performances of the Mao Shi Zhu Shu and the Shi Ji Chuan. While comparing and evaluating the pros and cons of the two books, this paper proposes that the Mao Shi Zhu Shu and the Shi Ji Chuan belong to group and individual writings, thus presenting problems with the details and the simplification of the contents. This paper proposes that the Mao Shi Zhu Shu and the Shi Ji Chuan share characteristics and merits and that both also possess same methods of reasoning. Finally, this paper proposes that the Shi Ji Chuan is capable of being the masterpiece of the Shi Jing Song study, but does not poses the characteristics to replace the Mao Shi Zhu Shu because of restrictions existing when the text was written.

《毛詩注疏》;《詩集傳》;《詩經》漢學;《詩經》宋學

Mao Shi Zhu Shu; Shi Ji Chuan; Shi Jing Han study; Shi Jing Song study