keyboard_backspace
返回卷期清單 (1:4 (No.71) / 2009 / 11)
1:4 (No.71)
/
2009 / 11
/
pp. 23 - 40
DOI:
國立大學教師的「機構典藏」與「自我典藏」：鼓勵抑或強制？
Public University Teachers’ Participation in Institutional Repository and Self-Archive: A Mandate?
29
48
作者
何萬順 One-Soon Her *
(國立政治大學語言學研究所;國立政治大學心智、大腦與學習研究中心 Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Chengchi University;Research Center of Mind, Brain, and Learning, National Chengchi University)
劉濟慈 Ji-Tsu Liu
(國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies, National Chengchi University)
何萬順 One-Soon Her *
國立政治大學語言學研究所;國立政治大學心智、大腦與學習研究中心 Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Chengchi University;Research Center of Mind, Brain, and Learning, National Chengchi University
劉濟慈 Ji-Tsu Liu
國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies, National Chengchi University
中文摘要

本文以開放取用作為立論的出發點，討論此一理念在三個面向上的實踐：開放取用期刊、機構典藏與自我典藏；我們並且提出網路民主與學術自主兩項理念作為實踐開放取用的理論基礎。此外，我們針對學者自身的自我典藏做深入的論述並討論其進行的步驟。最後，我們論證參與機構典藏與自我典藏應是國立大學教師與研究員的義務，校方除宣導與鼓勵外，仍應採取強制作為。

英文摘要

Based on the notion of “open access”, this paper discusses the three practical measures in realizing its ideal, i.e., open access journals, institutional repository, and self-archive. We further enlist two concepts, “Internet democracy” and “academic autonomy”, as the theoretical underpinning for the open access movement. We then focus on the individual scholars’ self-archive and discuss the concrete steps towards its implementation. Finally, we argue that full participation by teachers and researchers within a public university should not only be encouraged but also required.

中文關鍵字

開放取用;開放取用期刊;機構典藏;自我典藏;網路民主;學術自主

英文關鍵字

Open access;Open access journal;Institutional repository;Self-archive;Internet democracy;Academic autonomy