本文對清康熙61年（1722）以前的鹿港提出幾個新的觀點：1.由康熙24年（1685）蔣毓英的《臺灣府志》「鹿仔港」的名稱推論荷蘭時期鹿港有漢人的活動。2.研究康熙24年蔣毓英的《臺灣府志》以及清康熙34年（1695）高拱乾所修之《臺灣府志》，所記載的「半線港」可能是鹿港。3.透過文獻確認鹿港興安宮並非像以往所認為的由興化人草創，事實上康熙22年（1683）後，閩安水師進駐鹿港並草創興安宮，在興安宮附近形成兵丁、同籍人的生活聚落。康熙年間的興化人應該是因為同籍關係，來到鹿港依附在閩安協轄下的興化水師官兵駐地，而跟興安宮產生連結。4.透過古地圖發現約在康熙43年（1704）以前鹿港為平埔族鹿港仔社的社域，以往都說鹿港屬於馬芝遴社。5.透過古地圖及史料發現約在康熙43年鹿港仔社消失之後，漢人北上開墾中北部，鹿港舊祖宮應該草創於鹿港仔社消失後，此時的鹿港漢人漸增，廟位在碼頭區，規模很小。6.透過古今地圖的比對，以及史料的查證，康熙年間古濁水溪（大武郡溪）的河道大變動有可能是來至康熙33年（1694）的大地震。7.透過古今地圖的比對，發現康熙末期施世榜家族可能選擇利用康熙33年大地震之前的舊大武郡溪河道來做為八堡圳的基礎渠道，這樣開圳工程才會降低其困難度。

This article presents several new ideas： 1. From the name of "Luzikang" in Jiang Yuying's "Taiwan Fuzhi" in the 24th year of the Kangxi period (1685), it is inferred that there were Han Chinese living in Lukang during the Dutch period. 2. The research whether the "half-line port" recorded in Jiang Yuying's "Taiwan Fuzhi" in the 24th year of the Kangxi period (1685) and the "Taiwan Fuzhi" revised by Gao Gonggan in the 34th year of the Kangxi period of the Qing Dynasty (1695) is Lukang. 3. Through documents, it is confirmed that Lukang Xing'an Palace was not founded by Xinghua people as previously thought, in fact, after the 22nd year of the Kangxi period (1683), the Min'an navy entered Lukang and created Xing'an Palace, forming a living settlement of soldiers and clansmen near Xing'an Palace. The Xinghua people during the Kangxi period should have come to Lukang because of their homonymity and attached themselves to the Xinghua navy officers and soldiers under the Fujian Security Association, and were connected to Xing'an Palace. 4. Through ancient maps and documents, it was found that before about the 43rd year of the Kangxi period (1704), Lukang was the community of the LukangziofPingpu ethnicity, and it was said that Lukang belonged to the Taurinap. 5. Through ancient maps and historical materials, it is found that after the disappearance of the Lukangzi in about the 43rd year of the Kangxi(1704)period, the Han Chinese went north to reclaim the central and northern area, and the old ancestral palace of Lukang should have been created after the disappearance of the Lukangzi, at this time the number of Lukang Han Chinesegradually increased, and the temple was located in the dock area, and the scale was very small. 6. Through the comparison of ancient and modern maps, as well as the verification of historical materials, the great change in the course of the ancient Zhuoshui River (Dawu Junxi) during the Kangxi periodmay due toa huge earthquake in the 33rd year of the Kangxiperiod(1694). 7. Through ancient maps and documents, it is found that the Shi Shibang family,at the end of the Kangxi period,may have chosen to use the old Dawu Junxi River watercourse before the great earthquake in the 33rd year of the Kangxi period (1694) as the basic watercourse for the Ba Bao Chun, so that the excavation of the artificial channels project would reduce its difficulty.

鹿港; 鹿港仔社; 鹿仔港; 半線港; 八堡圳; 興安宮; 鹿港天后宮; 濁水溪; 大武郡溪

Lukang; Lukangzi; Luzikang; Ba Bao Chen; Xing'an Palace; Lukang Tianhou Temple; Zhuoshui river; Dawu Junxi