本文探究《學蔀通辨》對於《朱子晚年定論》、《道一編》等傾向 於朱陸調和之作品，所提出的批評內容。分別探討《學蔀通辨》中的 合理處與失誤處，並說明理由，以及此書批評效果。最後，衡定《學 蔀通辨》，並總結此書的貢獻及失誤，依此反省「朱陸異同」之爭論， 是否有更清晰的處理方式。

This paper aims to explore Chen Chien’s The Clarification of the Veiled Theories (Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien), specifically his comments on Wang Yang-ming’s The Later Chu Hsi: The Conclusion (Chu-Tzu-Wan-Nien-Ting-Lun) and Cheng Min-cheng’s The Way Is One(Tao-I-Pien), which, according to Chen, suffer from the same fault of reconciling and combining Chu Hsi and Lu Hsiang-shan. I will begin with a thorough investigation on Chen’s comments, sorting out as well as explaining the book’s merits and flaws, and weigh its intended effect. I endeavor to reevaluate this book in the hope of bring out a more constructive perspective on the issues concerning the reflections on the similarities and dissimilarities between Chu and Lu.

《學蔀通辨》、《道一編》、《朱子晚年定論》、朱陸異同、 朱陸調和。

The Clarification of the Veiled Theories (Hsueh-Pu-Tung-Pien), The Later Chu Hsi: The Conclusion (Chu-Tzu-Wan-Nien-Ting-Lun), The Way Is One (Tao-I-Pien), the similarities and dissimilarities between Chu and Lu, reconciliation and combination of Chu and Lu.