本文旨在探討臺灣地區之大陸研究學者對兩岸學術交流的看法與 觀點。基本上，近十四年來兩岸交流發揮了促進相互瞭解、提升學術 水準與分析視野以及影響決策之效果。儘管其成效仍屬有限，但是雙 方持續推動學術交流的作法仍值得肯定。當前兩岸交流的主要障礙在 於政治干預、官僚作風與程序繁瑣，以及雙方互信基礎脆弱。事實 上，封閉與猜忌只會造成更多的誤解與不安，唯有溝通與互動，尤其 是主動積極的回應才是化解兩岸僵局與危機的有效辦法。未來兩岸提 升學術交流的品質、強化專業對口單位的交流以及決策智囊的對話， 皆有助於鞏固互信與良性互動。

The purpose of this study is to examine the views of Taiwan's Mainland China affairs experts regarding Cross-Strait academic exchange. Academic flows across the Taiwan Strait have been worthwhile because they have improved mutual understanding by improving the quality of information available to scholars on both sides of the Strait. Such flows have also had an important influence on government decision-making. The current obstacles to academic exchange derived from political interference, bureaucracy, and mutual skepticism. However, isolation and suspicion could only lead to misunderstanding and heightened instability. To improve the present condition requires communication and interaction. We are convinced that increased academic exchanges, particularly those centered on interaction among scholars within the same field and dialogues between government think-tanks on either side of the Taiwan Strait, will enhance mutual trust and create a better political atmosphere between Mainland China and Taiwan.

學術交流;非機率抽樣;官僚作風;二元社群;策略管理

Academic exchange; Non-probability sampling; bureaucratism; two-community; Strategic management