中國大陸檔案學界主流的觀點認為：中國大陸在1952 年重構檔案學教育時，面臨「一無教員、二無教材、三無經驗」的困境。事實上，自1934 年到1949 年間的十六年，民國檔案學教育在辦學機構、教師和專著三個方面給中國大陸留下了頗具規模的檔案學教育資源。但這些不符合預期的檔案學教育資源在初期並未被啟用。中國大陸轉而向蘇聯求援，在蘇聯的幫助下，全盤移植蘇聯檔案學教育模式，而後才開始有選擇的啟用部分民國檔案學教育資源並著手將蘇聯檔案學教育模式「本土化」，打造符合國情的中國大陸檔案學教育體系。

The mainstream view of archival field in mainland China is, when the archival education was reconstructed in 1952, the Chinese mainland faced the dilemma of “no teacher, no textbook and no experience”. In fact, within the 16 years from 1934 to 1949, the archival education of the Republic of China had left quite a scale of archives education resources to the Chinese Mainland in three aspects, namely educational institution, teachers and monographs. However, such resources that deviated from the expected values were not used initially. Chinese mainland turned to the Soviet Union for help, and completely copied the Soviet archive education model with the help of the Soviet Union. After then, it began to selectively use some of the archive education resources of the Republic of China and began to localize the Soviet archival education model, creating an education system for archives in mainland China which is in line with China’s national conditions.

檔案學教育；中國大陸；蘇聯；文華圖專；中國人民大學

Archive education; Mainland China; Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; Boone Library School; Renmin University of China