為協助提升國內藝術類大學通識教育評鑑的成效，以改善通識教育推行的品質，本研究 基於教育指標客觀而精簡的特性，嘗試建構一套適合藝術類大學通識教育學門使用之評鑑指 標。首先經由文獻探討並分析現行政策，發展評鑑指標初稿，再利用德懷術邀集領域專家學 者，歷經三次問卷進行指標修正與整理，最後建構出之「藝術類大學通識教育評鑑指標」共 分成六個一級指標，分別是「教育目標、特色與發展計畫」，此一級指標下包含 2 個二級指 標及 9 個三級指標;「行政組織與運作」，其下包含 2 個二級指標及 11 個三級指標;「教學與 行政資源」，其下包含 2 個二級指標及 10 個三級指標;「師資來源與素質」，其下包含 2 個二 級指標及 14 個三級指標;「課程與教學」，其下包含 2 個二級指標及 19 個三級指標;以及「服 務與推廣」，其下包含 2 個二級指標及 7 個三級指標。研究並針對指標建構歷程與結果進行 分析與討論，最後亦對實務運用與後續研究提出建議。

In order to promote the evaluation and the quality of general education in universities of arts. The purpose of this study is to establish the evaluation indicators for universities of arts. First, we used document analysis to establish the primary scales. Then we used the Delphi Technique which proceed with three times questionnaire to improve the primary scales. Finally, the evaluation indicators for general education in universities of arts are completed which include 6 first-order indicators. “The goal, characteristic and plan of education” include 2 second-order and 9 third -order indicators. “The organization and operation of administration” include 2 second-order and 11 third -order indicators. “The resources of instruction and administration” include 2 second-order and 10 third-order indicators. “The quality of teacher” include 2 second-order and 14 third -order indicators. “The curriculum and instruction” include 2 second-order and 19 third-order indicators. “The service and continuing” include 2 second-order and 7 third-order indicators. Besides, the study also discuss the procedure and results of the establishment of evaluation indicators. At the end of the study proposes some suggestions for practical implementation and further study.

通識教育、評鑑指標、德懷術、藝術類大學

general education;evaluation indicators;delphi technique;universities of arts.