第42卷 第二期
/
2012 / 6
/
pp. 301 - 343
有名無實的「音步」與並非格律的韻律──新詩韻律理論的重審與再出發
Nominal “Meter” and Non-Metrical Rhythm: Reflections on the Rhythmical Theories of New Poetry
作者
李章斌
*
(南京大學中國新文學研究中心)
李章斌
*
南京大學中國新文學研究中心
中文摘要
在設計和創建新詩的節奏時,新詩格律的倡導者參照的對象集中於西方(尤其是英語)格律詩,試圖在現代漢語詩歌中建立類似西方詩歌那種以「音步」的均齊排列為基礎的節奏。但是現代漢語並沒有明顯的、普遍存在的輕重音或者長短音的區別,而聞一多 (1899-1946)、孫大雨 (1905-1997) 等格律詩的倡導者試圖以句法結構為原則來劃分「音步」或音節,以之為基礎構成節奏。這樣設計出來的格律詩並無有規律的內部語音排列,也無法和散文的節奏明顯地區分開來,其「音步」(或者音節)實際上有名無實,因此並無明顯的節奏效果。本文認為在探索新詩的節奏時,應重新回到節奏的基礎(即重複),而且參照的對象可以擴展到「開放形式」中的那些非格律的節奏方式。多多的詩歌明顯地實現了這種非格律的節奏,也為我們探索新詩節奏的方向開啟新的道路,並提供了有效的實例。
英文摘要
The pioneers of New Metrical Poetry focus their attention on the metrical poetry
of the West, trying to construct a rhythm system neatly consisting of “meters,” similar
to western metrical poetry. Modern Chinese, however, does not have a clear
distinction between stressed and unstressed syllables. In response, Wen Yiduo 聞一多
(1899-1946) and Sun Dayu 孫大雨 (1905-1997) group “meters” by means of their
syntactic structures and consider this to be the base of rhythm. This kind of metrical
poetry does not have any regular phonetic patterns, nor does it differ greatly from
prose. In other words, its “meter” is merely nominal and in fact has little rhythmical
effect. I propose that one should return to using repetition as the base of rhythm in
order to construct the rhythmical system of New Poetry, and more attention should be
paid to the metrical patterns of “open forms” instead of that of regulated forms.
Duoduo’s 多多 poetry stands as a great example of non-metrical rhythm, enlightening
us on how to construct New Poetry in the future.
中文關鍵字
格律;節奏;音步;重複;非格律韻律;多多
英文關鍵字
meter;rhythm;foot;repetition;non-metrical rhythm;Duoduo 多多