本文由解嚴前後法律之政治分析出發，說明我國刑事補償法制之變遷演進，再由司法院大法官會議解釋為脈絡，同時檢視補償法律之制（修）訂過程，用以分析戒嚴時期不當叛亂暨匪諜審判案件補償條例、戒嚴時期人民權利受損回復條例、二二八事件處理條例、冤獄（國家）賠償法及晚近刑事補償法之再造等規範競合情形，以期匯集「克服過去（轉型正義）」之補（賠）償措施在台灣的實踐經驗，並闡述國際刑法就體系不法行為的處遇理念。

This article focuses on changes in Taiwan's criminal law system after the lifting of martial law and describes the evolution of the country's criminal compensation law. Judgements by Taiwan's Council of Grand Justices are examined to analyze the process by which norms of criminal compensation law were revised.. By focusing on the dynamics between the Compensation Act for Wrongful Trials on Charges of Sedition and Espionage during the Martial Law Period and the Law of Compensation for Wrongful Detentions and Executions, the article brings to light Taiwan's experience with the practice of transitional justice and elaborates on ideas in international criminal law for dealing with wrongful acts perpetrated by state systems.

轉型正義（克服過去）;刑事補償規範;法律變遷;解除戒嚴;法律政治分析

transitional justice; criminal compensation norm; legal transition; lifting of martial law; legal and political analysis