全文圖錄款識的編纂，向為考古學界與古文字學界所重視。根據孫稚雛《金文著錄簡目》所編纂之《金文總集》為臺灣出版之極大城圖錄款識書籍，而《殷周金文集成》則是由中國大陸考古所策劃進行之大型編纂項目，二者皆收錄前吉金典籍之著錄與銘文拓片，提供讀者莫大的方便，廣為查考運用。然此二部大型金文圖錄款識，在編輯體例、收錄標準與銅器定名等方面之理念不盡相同，本文即希冀藉由《金文總集》2501至2800之三百器，逐一與《殷周金文集成》作排比分析，知其異同。

The published works about bronze vesssels are always emphasized by archaeology and etymology. Jin Wen Tzoong Jyi that is based on Jin Wen Chao Lu Chien Mu is the main publish work in Taiwan. Yin Chou Jin Wen Jyi Cherng which collect the most items is published in China. Both collect former publish works of bronze vessels. They have brought a lot of conveniences for researcher. But these two publish works are not the same in some ways like gerne, naming systems. This essay is to compare and analyze the differences and similarities between both throught the 300 items listed from number 2501 to number 2800 in Jin Wen Tzoong Jyi.

銅器、吉金著錄、銅器定名、《金文總集》、《殷周金文集成》

bronze vessels, Chi-Chin published work, naming Yin and Chou bronzeware item, Jin Wen Tzoong Jyi, Yin Chou Jin Wen Jyi Cherng