中國思想史中對於《老子》的關注，除了在先秦原創時期已《老子》為論述對象之外，另一個著墨的機會便是魏晉玄學時，以正史玄學家王弼的注《老》占得一席之地。此後發展的主流便是隋棠佛學、宋明理學，老子之學彷彿就此消聲匿跡。實際上，先秦以降，歷代有關注疏箋解《老子》的著作非常多，內容也十分廣泛。尤其在兩宋時期，注釋《老子》的人數，校之前代明顯增多，出現了前所未有的熱烈景況。不僅有觀的研究者及其相關著作眾多，研究者的身分與注釋觀點也有很大的分歧。就詮釋的向度來說，有宋一代正是新儒家性理之學漫衍的時期，若我們能仔細檢別出此期老子學中「以儒解老」的義理趨向，進一步發掘出此期老子學中「儒道交涉」的面相，蓋能對宋代老子學提供一個理解的視域。而這些資料的提出，也同時開擴了宋代性理之學研究的範疇。因此，筆者以宋代老子學中「儒道交涉」一側面為關注的焦點，擬以蘇轍《老子解》為切入之核心，企圖以基源問題研究法探析其義理之內蘊，並進一步分析說明其義蘊與理學概念命題相綰合之處。其次，則檢別出子由援引儒家經典釋解《老子》的部分，以加強闡述其「引儒入老」的詮解方式，進而後設反省其理論失當之處。

Besides as one discoursive object on the Pre-chin Dynasty, another point of “Lao-ze” in the Chinese Philosophy history lied in Wang-bi's (王弼) interpretation of “Lao-ze” on the Jin Dtnasty. After that, Study of Lao-ze disappeared for a long time. Actually, there' re many professional works about “Lao-ze” in every dynasties after the Pre-chin Dynasty, especially in the Northern and Southern Song Dynasty. According to the dimension of interpretation, we could apply a new realizable vision of Study of “Lao-ze” in the Song Dynasty if we examed the trend of ‘interprete Lao-ze by Confucianism’ during this period. Therefore, I'll foucs on the ‘intertextuality between Confucianism and Lao-ze’ on the Song Dynasty and attemp to appreciate their inner meanings as well as the further relationships with mentalism by Su-che's “Interpretations of Lao-ze”. Secondly, I'll exam Ze-you's (子由) approach of ‘quote Confucianism into Lao-ze’ and think his theoretical mistakes.

蘇轍、儒道交涉、老子學、引儒入老、性理之學

Su-che, intertextuality of Confucianism and Taoism, Study of Lao-ze, quote Confucianism into Lao-ze, Study of mentalism