唐代政權乃繼承隋代，而隋代之前卻是一個分裂的天下，政權的正統性是在南朝或是北朝呢？令狐德棻強調唐代先祖功業再北周，顯然將政權的正統性溯向北方政權。但隋、唐統一天下以後，出身南方的史家，如褚遂良、許敬宗、姚思廉與岑文本等人，雖非盡棄南人觀點，全然服膺於北人立場，但也出現了許多和北方史家相似的文學思想。故本文欲以史館制度為線索，說明在客觀的史館結構與主觀的君主意識交互運作底下，唐代史觀形塑出以政教關懷為首出考量的同質性文學思想。

Should the aurthority belongs to the Nan-dynasty or the Bei Dynasty before the union by the Tang-dynasty? Ling-hu-de-fan (令狐德棻) emphasized on the advantages of the ancestors of the Tang Dynasty established on the Bei Dynasty and obviously took it for granted that the authority belonged to the North. In addition, after Tang, historiographers who were borned in the South had the same opinions as those in the North. I'd like to describe and interpretate the homogenious literary thoughts the historiographers made on the Tang Dynasty which were forned under the historical museum system and emperor's consciousness.

唐代、史館制度、文學思想、正史

the Tang Dynasty, histroical museum system, literary thoughts, Authorized history