本文旨在說明：崛起於宋代的詩話，是一套「以言行事」的規範詩學。立足於詩話的歷史情境與言說立場，本文意圖重新由一個知識運作、社會交往等「重構後的脈絡」，省視宋代詩話之文化義蘊，重新正視它與專著不同的著作體例，探討從詩話產生以來如何形成了另一種說詩的傳統，詩學如何發展出一套全然不同的、在經驗內涵上更內傾、也更能召集群體參與、社會互動的知識運作。而這種有別於一般強調認知性、描述性、客觀性的學術型態，即本文所謂「規範詩學」。把握此種「規範詩學」的運作，除了提供詩學研究上相應的反思，更有助於吾人在「客觀知識」的成見之外、在看待文本「以言表意」的認知框架之外，把握更廣泛的語言情境、探索更多知識運作的可能，並以之重新看待更多種多樣的學術型態，抉發其相應價值。

The main idea of this article is that the rise of commentary on poetry in the Sung Dynasty is actually a normative poetics of illocutionary aim. Based on historical circumstances and standpoints of speaking, the article tries to inspect and explain the culture meaning of the Sung Dynasty in a new way. Confronting the style sheet which is very different the monograph. Discussing how and why the another tradition of poetry explanation had been formed since commentary on poetry was produced. And this academic style that differs from the one which emphasizes on cognizance, description, and externality is what we called “commentary on poetry” in this article.

詩話、規範詩學、以言行事、筆記小說、語錄體

Commentary on poetry, Normative poetics, illocutionary aim, Note-Novel, Quotation