清代《春秋》學反宋明空疏之風，先取《左傳》以為據，次溯傳注之源，從漢代經學中尋求古義古注，以建立有本之學。當清儒採《左傳》以為釋經根本，便不能不參考杜預《春秋》學，而深受其影響。杜預學雖承漢儒經說，在其〈春秋序〉所主張的解經觀念與方法上卻大異於漢儒。清代學者從搜羅漢代古經古說，逐漸深入、擴大至解經理論與方法，終觸及與杜預學相違的觀念方法，而有所抉擇。本文說明清代《左傳》學在重建以漢儒經說系統的歷程中，學者所面對與杜預《春秋》學主張在解經方法上的融合、接受，衝突及其影響。

The Zouzhuan Studies of Qing Dynasty built on evidence-based academic atmosphere, so they applied the Historical narrative of Du Yu's study in early age. Although in the latter of Qing Dynasty, Scholars criticized Du Yu and researched the Han interpretation of the classic study to base on, but they're still in Du Yu's influence. It makes Qing Dynasty's Classic study different from the Han Dynasty's. Therefore, scholars reconstructed the Zouzhuan Studies and pondered deeply the meaning of classical studies. The reconstruction has become an important transition of modern thought.

清代《左傳》學、《春秋》觀 、解經方法、杜預

Studies of Zouzhuan, view of Spring and Autumn Annals, Du Yu